This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
National consumer-rights law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP announced today that a federal judge handed down two rulings that add to Apple’s (NASDAQ:AAPL) legal woes in its attempt to defend itself of charges the company conspired to illegally inflate the price of e-books.
The rulings, issued by senior U.S. federal Judge Denise Cote, granted the class certification for consumers who sued Apple for conspiring with five publishers to fix e-book prices, and in a separate ruling, tossed out the bulk of arguments made by Apple’s two economists, who were attempting to reduce the amount of money Apple owes to injured consumers.
In an earlier court ruling, a federal judge declared that Apple – the sole remaining defendant – was liable in the price-fixing case. A trial likely set for this summer will determine the damages Apple will pay consumers.
“We are thrilled about what the certification means for consumers – with automatic trebling they could see a judgment of between $750 to $850 million,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman and lead attorney for the e-books litigation and class action against Apple. “Apple has remained stalwart, and the company’s goal has been shown clear – to eliminate pro-consumer pricing in favor of higher corporate profit.”
In a recently settled case against five book-publishing companies that conspired to raise and fix e-book prices and violated national antitrust laws, all other defendants settled out except Apple. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.; Hachette Book Group Inc.; HarperCollins Publishers LLC; Simon & Schuster Inc.; and Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, d/b/a Macmillan, all reached a settlement on behalf of consumers, leaving Apple the only remaining defendant, as the company has denied allegations of liability and objected to the certification of the class.
In the 86-page document granting class certification, Judge Cote stated, “This is a paradigmatic antitrust class action. If certification were not appropriate here, no antitrust class action could be certified.”