This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
Experience in overseeing the growing threat of cybersecurity risk is one of the key attributes boards will look for when appointing their next new corporate director, according to the 11th annual What Directors Think survey, a comprehensive report on boardroom trends.
The survey, which was released by NYSE Governance Services, a trusted source on governance, risk, ethics and compliance practices, and global, senior executive search firm Spencer Stuart, highlights the elusive nature of cyber risk, with 20% of directors lacking confidence in their board’s understanding of the many facets of it.
The nationwide survey of close to 600 corporate directors found that a background in information technology was one of the top four attributes boards would look for when appointing their next new director, along with financial expertise, industry expertise and CEO experience.
Overall, boards indicated they were confident in their ability to monitor cyber risks; however, about 40% acknowledged there was room to improve knowledge and understanding of risk oversight in general.
“Risk oversight has always been a key focus for boards but with developments in technology and the rise of social media, many are reassessing their skillset or partnering with organizations that specialize in risk management,” said NYSE Euronext Head of Global Issuer Services Jean-Marc Levy. “We’re currently working with a range of companies that want to better understand risk and put processes in place for managing it.”
Acknowledgement of the need to add new skills was further reinforced by directors’ views on the importance of periodically refreshing the board with new blood. Two-thirds of directors agreed that adding new perspectives and skills to the board was either important (51%) or critically important (16%).
Directors overwhelmingly agree that board assessment and evaluations are the primary tools for encouraging board refreshment, with 85% citing them as effective tools. Another 49% identified an age ceiling and 25% referenced term limits. However, recent turnover on S&P 500 boards portrays a different reality.