Despite these results, I'm hearing about how Edwards is "struggling to meet expectations." Let's recall that its growth in the U.S. is jumping 9.6% year over year. What's more, in overseas markets like Europe, Edward posted 14% revenue growth, culminating in an 11% year-over-year jump in international sales. I'm not sure what else the company could have done.
If Boston Scientific (BSX) and Covidien (COV) are still applying pressure on Edwards transcatheter valves business, this certainly wasn't reflected in the fourth-quarter earnings. Transcatheter valve revenue was up 22%.
Equally impressive was the 5% growth the company showed outside of the transcathether business. There were complaints that the company was not as diversified as it should be. But the 5% increase, which came in higher than expected, shows the company is making progress.
In terms of operations, Edwards posted full-year adjusted earnings of $3.44 per share, which soared more than 38% year over year, beating Street estimates by a meaningful margin.
You can argue that the share count reduction contributed to this. But that's also been the case for several med-tech players. Not many have been criticized to the extent of Edwards.
It still seems some are unwilling to accept that they were wrong about the November quarter. I won't deny that Edwards still has room for improvement. For instance, revenue is the Sapien business has flat-lined. The company has been unable to meet its own guidance in that area.
But given the strength of the transcatheter side and seeing how well the company is performing both in the U.S. and internationally, I'm willing to look beyond this deficit. To do anything but appreciate the progress this company is making is to nitpick.
All told, I still like this stock. It remains to be seen if shares will recover to its 52-week high of $90, but it doesn't have to get there. With the stock trading at around $70, $80 to $82a share is an attainable goal on the basis of domestic and international market share growth.
At the time of publication the author had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.
This article represents the opinion of a contributor and not necessarily that of TheStreet or its editorial staff.