This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
Nov. 22, 2013 /PRNewswire/ --
Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Achillion" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: ACHN) and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court, District of
Connecticut, and docketed under 13-cv-1479, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of Achillion between
April 21, 2012 and
September 27, 2013 both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). This class action seeks to recover damages against the Company and certain of its officers and directors as a result of alleged violations of the federal securities laws pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
If you are a shareholder who purchased Achillion securities during the Class Period, you have until
December 7, 2013 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at
www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact
Robert S. Willoughby at
email@example.com or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, x237. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.
Achillion is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers and develops solutions for infectious diseases such as HIV, hepatitis, and resistant bacterial infections. The Company focuses its research and development on products for the antiviral and antibacterial markets.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, including the safety and suitability of its premier investigative drug for the treatment of hepatitis, sovaprevir. Defendants failed to inform investors that sovaprevir in fact did not interact well with other drugs commonly administered to treat hepatitis and/or HIV. Specifically, the Company misled investors to believe that even though patients in the Company's clinical trials for sovaprevir had elevations in liver enzymes, that these liver enzymes elevations were transient and returned to baseline values and were attributable to non-drug-related factors. As a result of the foregoing, the Company's statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.