This Day On The Street
Continue to site right-arrow
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

$736M Farm Subsidy Loopholes Reward Absentee Managers

BOSTON ( TheStreet) -- This month, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report that found about half of the $1.5 billion in farm subsidies distributed last year were to people not "actively engaged" in farming.

In other words, about $736 million in farm subsidies went to people who don't take part in a farm's daily operation and are very often not at the farm. In fact, many farm subsidy recipients do not even live near the farms they get subsidies for -- sometimes they're not even living in the same state, since the agency's guidelines don't require a manager to actually visit the farm operation to be eligible.

The USDA's Farm Services Agency, which is responsible for the distribution of the subsidies, requires that a prospective recipient must be "actively engaged" in the farming operation to qualify for funding. But the GAO found that the agency defines "actively engaged" too broadly, and what constitutes as a "management" role.

"The requirements say the management contribution must be critical to the profitability of a farming operation, but Farm Service Agency officials told the GAO that making that kind of determination is difficult and subject to interpretation," the report says.

Furthermore, the GAO found that some farming operations were getting multiple subsidies for managerial positions.

In one instance, the GAO found that a farm in the Midwest got $400,000 in subsidy payments last year distributed among 11 members of the same family who all claimed management contributions, and two live in south Florida.

The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit advocating for reform of the Farm Bill and monitoring farm subsidy distributions, found that more than $24 million in direct payment farm subsidies were distributed to residents of America's 54 largest cities, including New York City, San Francisco and Chicago, regardless of whether they had ever worked on a farm.

Direct payments are based on a farm's historical production, meaning someone can still get funding under the program regardless of need or even whether a farm produces a crop. Even though land converted to non-farm uses is legally ineligible for direct payment subsidies, the GAO found that the USDA does a poor job of tracking land use changes.

1 of 2

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using your Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID or Yahoo login credentials. Alternatively, you can post a comment as a "guest" just by entering an email address. Your use of the commenting tool is subject to multiple terms of service/use and privacy policies - see here for more details.
Submit an article to us!
YHOO $44.13 -0.69%
AAPL $124.25 -0.14%
FB $81.66 -0.67%
GOOG $542.56 -0.99%
TSLA $187.59 -0.63%


DOW 17,698.18 -77.94 -0.44%
S&P 500 2,059.69 -8.20 -0.40%
NASDAQ 4,880.2280 -20.6570 -0.42%

Partners Compare Online Brokers

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs