NEW YORK ( MainStreet) -- It seems bigger is better when it comes to online review sites -- although this finding comes along with news that Americans are reading fewer reviews and growing increasingly uneasy over whether companies are "hiring" writers to pen positive reviews or being bashed by reviewers with an agenda -- for or against -- a specific company.
A study from Maritz Research says that there is a "lack of trust" among online consumers toward online reviews.
"Many people we surveyed expressed concern over online reviews on customer ratings sites being biased or even fake," says David Ensing, a consumer vice president at Maritz. "Many site visitors tend to believe that ratings sites select which reviews are posted, that employees post fake positive reviews for the companies they work for and that raters only share their positive or negative experiences instead of sharing a balanced opinion."
Furthermore, online shoppers tend to give more weight to larger, more popular review sites. For instance, TripAdvisor, Zagat, Open Table, Edmunds and Yelp rate, in that order, as the online review sites most trusted by Americans.That puts sites such as Dealer Rater, City Search and even Priceline at the bottom of the trust rankings. Consumers trust smaller sites less, possibly because they believe it's easier for fakers to manipulate the smaller, more local sites. A quarter of Americans say online reviews are often "unfair," and 33% of consumers are skeptical about all review sites, small and large, the survey says. But many Americans feel they have broken the code on the reviews, with a plurality of survey respondents saying they can tell when a review is fake. They feel the need to "read between the lines" to figure out the real takeaway from a review and to figure out if a reviewer has a personal, emotional bias against a company.