NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Five years after Lehman Brothers (LEHMQ) declared bankruptcy and gave us a new term called "breaking the buck," we are no safer from a banking crisis than we were before the whole mess started. In fact, we are worse off; at least most of us are with notable exceptions that include the usual suspects.
To be sure, you can make too much of Lehman, and if you don't follow the money all the way, you stop at the wrong entity to cast blame. Many claim the greediness of bankers caused their own demise, and while that's partially true, it's not the real question to ask because everyone, including you and I, are greedy too.
Greed is part of what makes us human and to pretend that some aren't motivated by self-interest is pure fantasy. If you set up a system that doesn't anticipate market participants to maximize revenue and profits, you're doomed for failure -- but that's exactly what the government did. The housing market wasn't the first time a government program had horrible unintended consequences and, unfortunately for all of us, it probably won't be the last. That is especially true considering few are demanding changes in the government.
When one bank collapses because of bad loans, we can all agree that management screwed up. However, when Bank of America (BAC), J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM), Citigroup (C), Morgan Stanley (MS), Goldman Sachs (GS), and many others needed a capital infusion to keep the doors open because a housing bubble popped, it's the system, not the banks.The housing crisis didn't start in 2008. It started years before when Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were allowed to guarantee and promote high-risk subprime lending to buyers the "evil banks" would not loan to otherwise. It was government-controlled entities that distorted the market and set the table for banks to fail more than eight years before.