NEW YORK, Aug. 12, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against Juniper Networks, Inc. ("Juniper Networks" or the "Company") (NYSE: JNPR) and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court, Northern District of California, and docketed under 13-cv-03733, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of Juniper Networks between April 24, 2012 and August 8, 2013 both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). This class action seeks to recover damages against the Company and certain of its officers and directors as a result of alleged violations of the federal securities laws pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
If you are a shareholder who purchased Juniper Networks securities during the Class Period, you have until October 11, 2013 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at email@example.com or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, x237. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.
Juniper Networks, Inc. designs, develops, and sells products and services that provide network infrastructure for networking requirements of service providers, enterprises, governments, and research and public sector organizations worldwide.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business and operations. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company was in violation of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"); (2) the Company lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting; and, (3) as a result of the foregoing, the Company's statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.