On July 26, 2013, Judge Robinson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware granted a motion by Butamax Advanced Biofuels, LLC (Butamax) for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,017,375 (the '375 Patent) and U.S. Patent No. 8,017,376 (the '376 Patent), granted in part and denied in part Butamax's motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the '375 Patent and the '376 Patent, denied a motion by Gevo for summary judgment of validity of the '376 Patent, and denied Butamax's motion to exclude expert testimony on the '376 Patent. This court ruling is not material to the business of the company and is not material to any of the company's other pending litigation cases with Butamax.On May 10, 2013, Gevo, announced that it had agreed to temporarily dismiss its lawsuit against Butamax and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for infringing one of Gevo's three GIFT ® patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,101,808 (the '808 Patent). Gevo maintains all of its other lawsuits against Butamax and DuPont for infringing Gevo's biocatalyst technology. The company decided to dismiss the '808 Patent lawsuit, for now, in part because Butamax doesn't have a commercial plant that infringes the '808 Patent and, according to DuPont, they will not have a commercial plant by the time of the trial.
Gevo Reports Second Quarter 2013 Financial Results
Check Out Our Best Services for Investors
- $2.5+ million portfolio
- Large-cap and dividend focus
- Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.
- Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
- Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
- A custom stock screener
- Model portfolio
- Stocks trading below $10
- Intraday trade alerts