Citing long-standing benefits of reliability, affordability and accountability in the current system, APS told the Arizona Corporation Commission in a filing earlier this week that deregulation of the state’s energy market would create uncertainty in the electricity delivery system.
APS, along with other stakeholders, was asked to provide information as the ACC reviews whether it should actively consider the possibility of changing the way Arizona customers receive their electric service with a move to a deregulated market.
In its filing, APS noted:
- Arizona’s electricity rates are below market. Electricity rates in the state are lower than the national average and are lower than rates in nearly all deregulated states, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
- APS is reliable. The company ranks in the top quartile for keeping the power on and minimizing unexpected outages.
- APS delivers high-quality customer service. In 2013, APS ranked fifth out of 54 large investor-owned utilities for customer satisfaction by J.D. Power & Associates, an independent market research company.
- APS keeps jobs and tax payments in Arizona. APS employs 6,500 and is the state’s largest taxpayer, paying state and local taxes surpassing $500 million. With deregulation, these jobs and taxes may go to companies located in other states.
“APS’s mission – to safely and efficiently generate and deliver reliable electric power and related services to our customers – is one we embrace with gravity,” said Don Brandt, President and Chief Executive Officer of APS. “We are proud to be stewards of Arizona's communities. It is no coincidence that APS is a national leader in every aspect of service reliability and customer service.”APS’s filing underscores eight core reasons why preserving the system today is in the best interest of customers:
- Customers demand affordability – Residential rates in deregulated states are 26 percent higher than those in regulated states and in 13 of the 17 states that are restructured, rates exceed the national average, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
- Arizona should remain in control of its energy future – In a deregulated market, the ACC will have to surrender some of its jurisdiction, which by default would go to federal regulators.
- Customers demand reliability – In a deregulated market, no one entity is held accountable for making sure there is enough generation to meet the energy needs of customers. Restructured markets have not provided enough financial incentives to spur investment in new generation, increasing the risk of unreliable electric service.
- Resource planning is vital – Deregulation eliminates the integrated resource planning process, which is the only time generation, transmission and fuel supply issues are folded together into one comprehensive analysis and subject to public input.
- Wholesale markets are not working in other areas – Wholesale markets are rife with examples of manipulation. Just this month, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission levied a record $435 million fine against British bank Barclays and, according to the Wall Street Journal, is weighing an even greater fine against JP Morgan Chase for alleged manipulation of the California and Midwest energy markets. These cases are reminiscent of the California Enron scandal of 2001.
- Arizona will face unique challenges – Along with overcoming the 2004 court decision stating that certain parts of Arizona’s first attempt at deregulation were unconstitutional, any plan to deregulate would require a revamping of the current transmission system.
- Restructuring is expensive – APS estimates restructuring costs would exceed $1 billion, which would eventually be paid for by customers.
- Regulation has stood the test of time – The national trend for those states that previously deregulated is to reverse course, with 26 states either re-regulating or cancelling plans to deregulate.