This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- While most of Apple's (APPL) reputation is centered on the fact that the company holds a strong position as one of the greatest innovators in recent memory, a good deal of attention has also been paid to the high margin levels associated with its products.
The results of this strategy are clear: Higher margins (and prices) mean that fewer items are sold, and critical demographics in emerging markets are forced to find cheaper alternatives (or even outright copies) made by other companies.
But the key question for Apple is whether or not these scenarios have prevented the company from achieving stronger profits, and sacrificed important markets to its competitors. At this stage, there appears to be a growing sense that Apple's reluctance to alter its strategies has limited profit growth and put the company in a vulnerable position when compared to companies with a more flexible approach.
Thus far, many wireless carriers in Asia have been unwilling to accept Apple's stringent partnership conditions. This essentially means that since the end of 2011, Apple has had only 11 wireless-service providers sign on to sell the iPhone. This also means that there could be as many as 2.8 million potential smart phone customers that are unable to buy the iPhone as part of a service plan.
Currently, Apple has about 240 wireless carriers that sell its mobile devices, with key holdouts seen in countries like China, India, Russia, and Japan. As a comparative example, Samsung (Apple's biggest competitor) is able to sell its products to nearly all of the 800 wireless-service providers around the world. At China Mobile (CHL) alone, Apple is losing out on roughly 700 million potential customers because its devices are not compatible with the China Mobile networks. Clearly, this is something Apple wants (and needs) to change. But will they be able to bend on the time-tested market approach that has brought so much success to the company in the last decade?
Recent stories hinting that Apple has considered producing a cheaper version of the iPhone would suggest that the answer to this question is "yes." But changing the company's flagship product to structure an agreement with companies like China Mobile would likely not be enough to complete a partnership. Reported points of contention from China Mobile have mostly centered on the subsidy Apple will require China Mobile to dish out before handsets can be distributed to customers.