Unlike Dell, there was very little to be excited about with HP's performance, even though networking revenue was up 1%. I don't believe market leader Cisco (CSCO) will be running for cover. Elsewhere, in areas such as servers, which fell 12%, it still seems as if HP is unable to capitalize on the weaknesses shown in this area by both Dell and IBM (IBM).
In that regard, if HP is unable to gain traction when its main rivals are struggling, when is it ever going to happen? I've made the comparison above and it's worth repeating here -- cost-cutting can only take you so far. Although it did help boost HP's bottom line and advanced gross margins by 50 basis points, operating income still fell 13%.
I do question whether it's a good strategy for HP to turn away any business with the fear of sacrificing margins. Cisco went in entirely the opposite direction and offered its large customers what some analysts called "aggressive discounts" that helped Cisco close plenty of business this quarter.
Given the lower-than-expected segment numbers, I don't know if HP is in a position to turn away any business. This strategy works for IBM. But that's IBM. HP has not yet reached that status.There are still pressing issues such as HP's mobile strategy and how it plans to become relevant in the realm of smartphones and mobile devices. Plus, I don't believe management effectively outlined the company's new growth markets and how they will propel the stock higher in the new tech age dominated by Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG). The stock's resurgence suggests a postponement in HP's sentence to the glue factory. But I would caution investors about counting their chickens before they hatch. You have to consider HP stock has only recovered losses incurred over the past year. On balance, HP is still the same company with the same problems. It's only leaner. At the time of publication the author was long AAPL. Follow @saintssense This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.