NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Four years ago my son and I were honored to cover the CompuTex show in Taiwan, which is now the only computer show that matters.
Back then we were hunting for "desktop Linux." We finally found it in a corner of a secondary show floor. That was back when Windows netbooks were all the rage.
The rage this year is
(INTC - Get Report)
Haswell, its new chip for notebooks and tablets. It follows by just a year the introduction of a similar chip, dubbed Ivy Bridge. Ivy Bridge introduced a new microarchitecture, Haswell a smaller die. The result is a low-power design whose circuit lines are
just 22 nanometers apart.
Haswell is aimed at what Intel calls
the "2 in 1" market
, devices that double as tablets or notebook PCs, with 50 different designs in the pipeline.
The fate of these designs will determine whether the stock, which has risen to almost $25.50 on Haswell hope, continues to run or falls back. Since Intel has nearly 5 billion shares, the bounce of $5 a share from February's lows represents $25 billion in new equity value.
All this is aimed at
, whose low-power designs are licensed to device makers and now power the
(AAPL - Get Report)
line, among others. But Intel's problems go deeper.
Full disclosure. I did a little consulting for Intel a decade ago, in another lifetime, and the problem today remains what it was then. Intel sells chips it expects manufacturers to design around. Device makers design the chip around the product, and have a proprietary hold on the whole work.
Still, the new Haswell can run nine hours on a standard battery charge, with double the graphics performance of Ivy Bridge. The problem is the price, as high as $454 for the high-end Core i7 model. That's more than many devices cost these days.
The best news, however, is that Intel may finally be ending its dependence on
(MSFT - Get Report)
announced this week that an Intel chip will run the 10-inch version of
its new Galaxy 3 tablets
(GOOG - Get Report)
Android, and the two are working on a mobile operating system called Tizen. It's not a total win -- Samsung still uses ARM designs extensively -- but it's a big step forward.