With Fannie and Freddie paying such large dividends to the government, while the dividend payments on the junior preferred shares remain suspended and while the GSEs aren't allowed to repurchase any of the government-held preferred shares, the senators may be responding to growing anger among investors.
Two high-profile investors recently discussed their holdings in shares of Fannie and Freddie, pointing the way to possible lawsuits against the government, depending on whether Fannie and Freddie are allowed to move past the bailout and go on operating, or on the precise way they are "dissolved."
Ralph Nader in an op-ed piece published in the Wall Street Journal on May 24 said he was a shareholder in both GSEs and that common shareholders of Fannie and Freddie should fight against the federal government's "great Fannie and Freddie rip-off."
Fairholme Capital Management on Monday said that its clients, including shareholders including shareholders of
The Fairholme Fund
The Fairholme Allocation Fund
(FAAFX), "own approximately $2.4 billion par value of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Preferred Stock and are ready to help with a restructuring that accelerates the return of meaningful investment to the secondary mortgage market."
The comments from Fairholme could point the way to a deal under which government-held preferred shares could be converted to common shares, thus making the earnings of Fannie and Freddie available to all shareholders, and enabling the GSEs eventually to repurchase the government-held preferred shares. This would be similar to the way in which the massive bailout of American International Group (AIG - Get Report) was resolved. In a note to clients on Tuesday discussing the senators' draft bill, FBR analyst Edward Mills wrote "while this legislation faces significant hurdles and GSE reform is still a long ways off, this legislation is significant as it marks the most constructive bipartisan effort yet to move Fannie and Freddie beyond conservatorship." According to Mills, the inclusion of any consideration for non-government shareholders of Fannie and Freddie at this early stage of the political process could lead to a "negative press reaction." "Should the press develop the narrative that Congress is rewarding 'speculative bets' on these securities, we could see efforts to change or modify this provision," Mills wrote. "Not knowing how the final bill will be drafted, it is also difficult to determine what, if any, economic value would be left after Treasury has been repaid its investment." A knee-jerk hostile press relation to the "evil investors" holding junior preferred and common shares of Fannie and Freddie may make for a rough ride in Washington, but the senators will also have voters in mind. After all, Fairholme in its announcement on Monday referred to "thousands of shareholders" of mutual funds holding GSE shares. -- Written by Philip van Doorn in Jupiter, Fla. >Contact by Email. Follow @PhilipvanDoorn