NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- As consumers wait to see how a new wave of telecom sector consolidation impacts carrier pricing plans for popular smartphones such as Apple's (AAPL - Get Report) iPhone and Google (GOOG) Android devices, billionaire hedge fund investors such as John Paulson of Paulson & Co. appear poised to play an outsized role in the industry's fate.
Second-tier wireless providers such as Sprint (S), T-Mobile and MetroPCS (PCS) are all currently engaged in merger efforts that, depending on shareholder votes, could reinvigorate the U.S. wireless industry so price-competitive players have a chance at winning back customers and profits from AT&T (T - Get Report) and Verizon (VZ - Get Report), who've consistently gained market share in the shift to smartphones.
Hedge fund investors, most notably, Paulson & Co., have recently staked large bets on consolidating wireless providers such as MetroPCS, Sprint, Clearwire (CLWR) and Leap Wireless (LEAP), which isn't currently engaged in merger efforts but is the subject of takeover speculation.
As smartphone addicts await the ultimate outcome of consolidation and its impact on pricing and service, there is currently a risk hedge fund investors will leave consumers worse off.Given stakes such as Paulson's 9%-plus holding in MetroPCS and Leap Wireless shares, in addition to significant positions in Sprint and Clearwire, the hedge fund is already playing a key role in how wireless providers partner up. Other hedge funds are also staking big bets. Sprint was among David Einhorn-run Greenlight Capital's biggest new investments, while Omega Advisors, headed by Leon Cooperman, is in the interesting position of holding significant positions in both Sprint and Dish Network (DISH) as a possible bidding war emerges. Asset managers Owl Creek, MHR Investment Management and Mount Kellett Capital also have significant wireless holdings. The question is whether those investors also have an incentive to ensure the wireless industry is reconfigured in a way that will maximize the benefit to consumers. There is the risk that consolidation efforts get tangled by the self-interest of standoffish investors such as Paulson, leaving the industry worse off, according to Ronald Gruia, a telecom analyst at Frost & Sullivan. Gruia points to debt levels as crucial to the viability of the likes of T-Mobile and Sprint, in the wake of consolidation. On that front, Paulson & Co. appears inconsistent when it comes to the firm's stance on merger proposals for MetroPCS and Sprint. For instance, Paulson raised big objections to T-Mobile and MetroPCS's merger, in a deal that would have given the combined entity net debt of 3.6 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The hedge fund, however, appears less concerned by Dish Network's $25.5 billion offer for Sprint, which will leave the merged company with net debt of 4.7 times EBITDA before revenue synergies with a net present value of $37 billion and $11 billion in cost savings take hold. There is a differerence in that T-Mobile's parent, Deutsche Telekom, initially proposed to rollover $15 billion in intercompany debt as a consideration in its merger with MetroPCS. Dish, on the other hand, is simply financing an acquisition of Sprint. Dish is offering $7 a share for Sprint, $4.76 in cash and about $2.24 in Dish stock. Japan-based SoftBank is offering to make an $8 billion equity capital infusion into Sprint at $5.25 a share -- and a tender offer for 70% of company's existing shares at $7.30 -- in a move it said would revitalize the carrier's finances. On Tuesday, Paulson said it favors Dish's proposal for Sprint over one offered by SoftBank, which, according to the fund's own analysis, will leave the merged entity with net debt of just 1.5 times EBITDA, in line with AT&T and Verizon. While Gruia and other telecom analysts believe both Dish Network and SoftBank's proposals are serious and could have significant benefits to wireless consumers, some believe investors will end up opting for a higher offer from SoftBank. "The Sprint shareholders, if they are smart about how they go about this, will get a better offer from SoftBank." said Gruia. Supporting Dish's offer for Sprint, on the other hand, may turn out to be a negative for consumers given the up to $45 billion in debt the merged entity could carry. "The longer term strength of the company will trump short term gains of the stickiness of the bundle," said Gruia of SoftBank's proposed recapitalization of Sprint, and Dish's proposed contribution of spectrum, broadband and satellite TV services. In supporting Dish's proposal for Sprint, Paulson said in a statement, "Dish is offering more value to Sprint shareholders and also is contributing valuable spectrum, 14 million subscribers, cost synergies and revenue synergies."