NEW DELHI, April 10, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Following extensive research, the GSMA today called for governments and regulators to reassess their approach to Universal Service Fund (USF) levies. In a new report issued today, the GSMA concludes that most funds are not succeeding in delivering their stated goal of widening access to telecommunication services and that alternative market-based solutions are more effective.
The report estimates that more than one-third of the 64 funds surveyed have yet to disburse any of the contributions they have collected and that more than 11 billion USD remains undisbursed, money that could otherwise be used to extend rural coverage or lower the cost of mobile ownership. In India, the Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) continues to impose approximately a five per cent levy on operator revenues, despite the fact that is contains over 4 billion USD of accumulated funds. India is not alone as regards the collection of substantial amounts of money from the mobile industry, for example in Cote D'Ivoire and Paraguay, the USF represents in excess of 0.6 per cent of the countries' GDP.
"Our research shows that, despite the fact that there is an ever-increasing amount of money sitting unused in these funds, governments continue to collect still more from the mobile operators. The situation needs urgent government review and attention, as the money collected to date far exceeds the amount that is needed to ensure universal access," said Tom Phillips, Chief Regulatory and Government Affairs Officer, GSMA. "The reality is that these funds have become a convenient form of taxation on the telecommunications industry and in the majority of cases, they should be closed down and the balance of monies held used to extend access to mobile services to those unable to afford them, or those groups that live in particularly remote areas."
Key findings of the research:
- Out of the 64 funds surveyed, less than an eighth of them are achieving their targets;
- Funds are not always allocated in a competitively and technologically neutral way;
- There is no evidence that Universal Service Funds are an effective way to achieve universal service goals and in fact they may be counter-productive, as taxing commercial investors in such a way makes rural investments less likely; and
- Alternative solutions, for example private/public partnerships such as those established in Finland, have been able to deliver better and more effective outcomes.