In the most recent quarterly reporting period ending February 2013, comScore estimates Apple increased its lead over number two Samsung. Thirty-eight-point-nine percent of smartphone subscribers carry iPhones. That's up 3.9% from the previous three-month window, dwarfing Samsung's share -- spread across multiple devices -- of 21.3% (a 1.0% quarter-over-quarter increase). Shift from OEMS to operating platforms and, even though it lost two percentage points between the beginning of December 2012 and the end of February 2013, Google's Android still commands 51.7% of the market vs. iOS's 38.9% (up 3.9% Q-over-Q). It's plain to see: If Apple opened iOS up tomorrow to anybody who wanted to license it, power a piece of hardware with it or make a misguided attempt to integrate their social network into mobile devices with it, it would dominate the market. As both an OEM and platform, Apple could adopt a hybrid of the Samsung/Google strategy and have, without breaking a sweat, 80% market in North American and beyond.
But that's not what Apple does. If it starts, make no mistake, it beats itself. Google and Samsung would deserve credit for little more than planting the idea in Tim Cook's head to shift course and veer from the Apple way. That's precisely why things like premium-priced iPad minis and iTVs make sense -- and work/will work for Apple -- whereas the color and size change strategies we have seen with iPod should be used sparingly, if at all, elsewhere in the product line. Don't look to Google or Samsung or OS marketshare numbers to see if Apple is winning or losing. You'll wind up making unfair comparisons like so much of the tech and financial media.
Even in its uncertain -- dare I say bruised and battered state (at least psychologically and in the eyes of Wall Street) -- Apple dominates the smartphone wars. Don't expect that to change unless Tim Cook stumbles and makes it so. Follow @rocco_thestreet -- Written by Rocco Pendola in Santa Monica, Calif.