The official policy of the U.S. government is precisely the same as that of the UK (hence the joint "position paper"). The FDIC simply didn't articulate its own plans for bank robbery to the same degree. Put another way: There were seven sections detailing how the UK would "resolve" these "systemically important institutions" (but no mention of bank-robbery) versus only two sections for the U.S.
Now we come to the remainder of the chronology, which not only proves that the Cyprus Steal was planned (at least) as far back as December 2012, but that the fix was in: our traitor governments had already reached agreement with the traitor government of Cyprus to perpetrate this crime.
The EU banking cabal and its puppet politicians "surprise" the world by announcing a plan to steal money out of the bank accounts of ordinary people in order to "recapitalize" a private bank in Cyprus, while a publicly owned bank would be liquidated and also fed to the private bank. Victimizing the people twice in order to temporarily prop up another reckless/insolvent fraud factory.
As noted previously, this was obviously a proposal intended to fail in this silly, two-act theater. This was proven by the
of the European Central Bank that the original proposal must "magnify the hit" on smaller depositors. This would ensure maximum public outrage, and guarantee that the politicians would vote against it.
The ECB is the third member of the Western Troika, along with the
and the Bank of England. They were solely responsible for the final language of the original proposal; solely responsible for its rejection.
Cyprus politicians (government and opposition alike) unanimously reject the "bail-in." What a surprise!
Stephen Harper, leader of Canada's Conservative government
the 2013 Canadian Budget, which makes the "bail-in" the official law of Canada.
[page 145] The Government proposes to implement a bail-in regime for systemically important banks...
As with the U.S. and UK, the Canadian document contains nothing but weasel-words that never fully define what "bail-in" really means -- i.e. robbing peoples' bank accounts to temporarily prop-up reckless/parasitic banks.
Is Stephen Harper the most stupid politician in the Western world? Two days after the government of Cyprus unanimously rejects bank robbery as a means to "recapitalize banks," Harper makes this the official law of Canada. Would he really want to go into the next election as "Stephen Harper: Bank Robber of the West" or did Harper know something then almost no one else knew?