This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
New AUC to provide recommendations on common treatment scenarios based on the latest research and physician input
March 22, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Board of Directors approved its first Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC). The topic of this first AUC is the treatment of
distal radius fractures, one of the most common fractures in the body. A fracture of the distal radius occurs when the area of the radius (the larger of the two forearm bones), near the wrist, breaks due to trauma.
AUC provide clinicians and patients with a measure of when, how and for whom medical and surgical procedures should be used.
"The Academy is taking yet another step forward to ensure that patients receive high-quality, cost effective and appropriate care by providing our members – and other medical personnel – with appropriate use criteria to help guide their clinical decision making," says orthopaedic surgeon
Kevin Bozic, M.D., MBA, chair of the AAOS Council on Research and Quality.
According to orthopaedic surgeon
William C. Watters III, M.D., chair of the AUC section of the Committee on Evidence-Based Quality and Value, "AUCs help us marry the evidence-based literature and the expertise and experience of clinicians who are specialists in a specific topic area. Because randomized clinical trials are often not available or cannot apply to the wide range of patients seen in everyday practice, an AUC tells us what's appropriate in most specialists' eyes and what's inappropriate in most specialists' eyes. "
The AUC process uses three separate panels:
The writing panel combined clinical and procedural expertise with evidence-based information from the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline on the treatment of distal radius fractures to define and describe the criteria for this procedure.
The review panel provided suggestions regarding improvement of the materials constructed by the writing panel.
The voting panel utilized clinical expertise of physicians from multiple medical specialties and evidence-based information to assign the appropriateness of various treatments for each of the patient scenarios developed by the writing group.
Important AUC Findings:
This AUC covers 10 treatments and includes 216 common patient scenarios who might present to a clinician with a distal radius fracture.
For each of the 216 patient scenarios, the 10 treatments were rated by the voting panel using a 9-point appropriateness scale. Treatments that received a median group rating of 7-9 were defined as "Appropriate"; treatments that received a median group rating of 4-6 were defined as "May Be Appropriate"; and treatments that received a median group rating of 1-3 were defined as "Rarely Appropriate".
Out of more than 2,000 different patient/treatment combinations:
36 percent were rated as "Appropriate"
44 percent were rated as "May Be Appropriate"
20 percent were rated as "Rarely Appropriate"
"This is the kind of evidence that the Affordable Healthcare Act is asking of medical practitioners – quality-based and value driven," says Dr. Watters. "These treatment recommendations also will be extremely helpful in aiding the patient-physician discussion."