This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
National Center for Policy Analysis Warns Policymakers of Costly, Unintended ConsequencesWASHINGTON,
March 20, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Federal and state policymakers should avoid enacting laws that undermine payers' ability to use mail-service pharmacies, preferred pharmacy networks, and other innovative pharmacy benefit management (PBM) tools, the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) asserts in a new report,
"Unnecessary Regulations that Increase Prescription Drug Costs."
"This report shows policymakers that appeasing the drugstore lobby means higher prescription drug costs for small businesses, consumers, and government programs," said
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) President and CEO Mark Merritt.
here to read the NCPA report which highlights a number of regulations and laws that could increase prescription drug costs, including:
Barriers to Competition: State Boards of Pharmacy Conflict of InterestBackground: The report highlights how some states are seeking to transfer regulatory authority of drug plans from the state's insurance commissioner to the state's Board of Pharmacy.
NCPA: "Because state pharmacy boards are controlled by pharmacists, giving them authority over drug plans creates conflicts of interest that could undermine drug plans' ability to negotiate lower prices with pharmacy networks."
Barriers to Lower Cost Mail-Service PharmaciesBackground: Employers and payers use a variety of incentives to encourage patients to use efficient mail-service pharmacies to address chronic illnesses, such as diabetes.
Mail-service pharmacies will save Medicare seniors, employers, unions, government employee plans, consumers, and other commercial-sector payers
$46.6 billion in prescription drug costs over the next ten years.
NCPA: "Unfortunately, some states are enacting laws that interfere with the ability of drug plans to reward enrollees that use the plan's mail order option by barring drug plans from offering lower prices for mail-order dispensing. This unnecessarily raises costs for consumers, insurers and employers. Obviously, these laws mostly aim to benefit local community pharmacies rather than consumers."
Barriers to Competitive Pharmacy NetworksBackground: A new
study finds that the extraordinary number of pharmacies in
the United States offers an opportunity to save
$115 billion over the next decade through the greater use of preferred and limited pharmacy networks. However, some states have in place so-called "any willing pharmacy" laws and regulations that force plans to contract with pharmacies that don't meet their quality standards or geographic access needs.
NCPA: "These any-willing-pharmacy laws are costly to taxpayers, employers and patients alike. The Federal Trade Commission notes that these laws reduce the drug plans' bargaining power, leading to higher drug prices and higher premiums for consumers."
Barriers to Efforts to Combat Fraud Background: Health care fraud is a problem that increases overall health costs and is especially burdensome in Medicare and Medicaid. Billions of claims are submitted to millions of providers, making fraudulent claims easy to disguise. PBMs and companies processing electronic payments are effective at discovering irregularities that lead to fraud.
NCPA: "Regulations requiring Medicare drug plan administrators to pay claims within 14 days make it difficult to detect fraud before a claim has been paid. At the very least, drug plans need the authority to delay paying questionable claims to providers suspected of fraud. Plans also need greater authority to exclude or suspend suspected fraudulent providers from networks and conduct routine audits of participating pharmacies.
"Congress and state legislatures should avoid well-meaning, but ill-conceived, regulations intended to protect consumers, which often have the opposite result. A better way to ensure desirable outcomes is to promote a competitive environment free of market distortions that favor one party over another."