This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
March 20, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- A recent court decision limiting the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) market enforcement authority is disappointing and highlights an issue that may be ripe for legislative action, FERC Commissioner Tony Clark said Wednesday at a
Platts Energy Podium newsmaker event in
"The unfortunate outcome is that there is less light in an area that deserves it and ultimately the public's interest is harmed when that happens," Clark said. Clark is the newest of the FERC's five commissioners.
Clark was referring to a
March 15 decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that held that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has exclusive jurisdiction over futures trades.
The court tossed out FERC's
$30 million penalty against natural gas futures trader
Brian Hunter for allegedly manipulating the New York Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures contracts in the spring of 2006. The CFTC is separately prosecuting Hunter for allegedly manipulating those markets.
Clark told the Platts Energy Podium that he wished the court had taken a different path.
"I was disappointed with the decision. I would have hoped that there might have been a way for the court to attempt to harmonize the statutes that were at play in a way that could have I think in the best way protected the public's interest."
The ruling may mean that there is less oversight of cross-market manipulation, he said.
"I don't think that's what Congress intended, so there may be a legislative fix that's needed."
FERC has a number of enforcement proceedings pending, involving alleged market manipulation by companies that traded at a loss in either a financial or physical electricity market in order to gain in the other market.