This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
The law firm of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP announces that
class action litigation has been brought on behalf of all persons who purchased the securities of Tangoe, Inc. (“Tangoe” or the “Company”) (NYSE: TNGO) between December 20, 2011 and September 5, 2012, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Tangoe securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff by no later than April 30, 2013. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Your share of any recovery in the action will not be affected by your decision of whether to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. You may retain Lieff Cabraser, or other attorneys, as your counsel in the action.
Tangoe, Inc. investors who wish to learn more about the action and how to seek appointment as lead plaintiff should click here or contact Douglas I. Cuthbertson of Lieff Cabraser toll-free at 1 (800) 541-7358.
Background on the Tangoe, Inc. Securities Class Litigation
This action is brought on behalf of all purchasers of the securities of Tangoe, Inc. ("Tangoe" or the "Company") during the Class Period.
Tangoe develops and markets computer software that helps companies manage and control their fixed and mobile communications assets and costs.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants conducted a scheme to inflate their share price through a series of acquisitions, and made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was overstating organic growth by underreporting the percentage of revenue derived from recent acquisitions; (ii) the Company was not growing customers organically as its deferred implementation fees failed to grow; and (iii) as a result of the above, the Company's financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.