Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.
- Do you, or did you, own shares of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ GS: MXWL )?
- Did you purchase your shares before April 28, 2011, or between April 28, 2011 and March 7, 2013, inclusive?
- Did you lose money in your investment in Maxwell Technologies, Inc.?
- Do you want to discuss your rights?
announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (“Maxwell” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ GS:
) between April 28, 2011 and March 7, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).
If you purchased shares of Maxwell during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold Maxwell, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact
Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire
or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300, Garden City, NY at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail to
, or at:
Maxwell develops, manufactures and markets energy storage and power delivery products for transportation, industrial, telecommunications and other applications and microelectronic products for space and satellite applications. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that: (a) Maxwell had overstated its revenues and earnings in 2011 and 2012 in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”); (b) Maxwell had reported revenues prior to the time the sales price was fixed and/or collection was reasonably assured; and (c) Maxwell’s internal accounting controls were deficient and permitted the premature recognition of revenue, leading to materially misstated financial results. As a result of defendants’ false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.