A final example is pension benefit options. Most pension plans allow married couples to elect to have their pension benefits paid out over their own life and the life of their spouse, ensuring that the pension income will not stop at the death of the pensioner. This option is not available to a recently divorced person who may be caring for someone, such as a parent, sibling, child or other family member who might need the pension income after the death of the pensioner. In this case, taking a lump sum from the pension rather than choosing a payout option may work better for someone recently divorced who knows they will need the availability of these funds beyond their own life.
They are at a disadvantage in terms of taxes, as the tax code favors married people.
Hooks says: The United States uses a graduated income tax system whereby the higher your income the higher the rate of tax on your income. The amount of income subject to higher rates begins at a lower level for single taxpayers than it does for married taxpayers. For example, in 2012, married taxpayers will see their income taxed at 28% once taxable income exceeds $142,701, while single taxpayers will see their income taxed at 28% once taxable income exceeds $85,651. This disparity exists for all tax brackets -- except for the 35% tax bracket, at which both married and single taxpayers pay 35% once their taxable income exceeds $388,351.
What this means is that the recently divorced 50-plus person with taxable income of $150,000 will pay more income tax than the married couple with taxable income of $150,000 -- 19% more.They are largely ignored by financial professionals. Hooks says:Recently divorced people over 50 are an under-served market because there is a mistaken belief that certain planning strategies are not appropriate for nonmarried people. One of the major reasons married people purchase life insurance on their lives is in the event that one spouse were to die prematurely, the proceeds of the life insurance could be used by the surviving spouse for support. There may be a presumption that life insurance is not necessary for the recently divorced 50-plus person because there is no spouse to support. However, people are living longer, and as such the recently divorced 50-plus person may have parents who are still alive that they are supporting. The parents may be negatively impacted if the recently divorced 50-plus person were to die, so the use of life insurance may be just as appropriate. The same situation can arise with long-term care insurance. The insurance many times is sold to preserve assets for the spouse that does not need care. With no spouse there may be a presumption that there is no need for long-term care insurance. Assets will be sold to pay for care and if nothing is left over, so be it. However, in addition to the financial reasons for long-term care insurance, there may be nonfinancial reasons as well. Long-term care insurance policies provide for care managers to help determine levels of care as well as the plan of care. The presence of insurance can assist someone in being accepted into a facility that they otherwise would not have been able to get into due to their existing assets.