In the news release, Consumer Groups Call on New York Governor & Legislature for Utility Industry Changes Post-Sandy, issued 12-Feb-2013 by AARP New York State over PR Newswire, we are advised by the organization that the New York Utility Performance link was incorrect. The correct URL is http://bit.ly/Yo3Uig. The complete, corrected release follows:
Consumer Groups Call on New York Governor & Legislature for Utility Industry Changes Post-Sandy
AARP, PULP and Others call on State Leaders for Better Oversight & Stronger Consumer Protections in for Utility Ratepayers
NEW YORK, Feb. 12, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- As New York utility companies propose to hit New Yorkers with hundreds of millions of dollars in rate hikes to recover Sandy-related costs, AARP and the Public Utility Law Project (PULP) say it's these kinds of actions that demand change in the industry.
Following up on the recommendations made by the Moreland Act Commission, today, AARP and the PULP issued a new analysis outlining crucial areas that need improvement to better protect New York consumers and ensure rate hikes are fair. More than half of AARP's 2.5 million members live in areas impacted by Sandy."New Yorkers, who already pay some of the highest utility bills in the nation, need and deserve a stronger voice to combat soaring utility rate hikes," Beth Finkel, State Director for AARP in New York State. "Utility companies have the money and resources to be the biggest voice at the table and continually pushing through higher rates, the playing field is uneven for consumers who see their interests go largely unrepresented. It is time to change that." " New York lags other states in supporting advocacy for residential consumers in the complex and protracted Public Service Commission utility rate cases that affect vital consumer and public interests," said Gerald Norlander, Executive Director, Public Utility Law Project (PULP). " New York should put more resources into independent residential utility consumer advocacy and reform the funding streams and structures to bolster it." Today, AARP and PULP issued four recommendations the organizations say will better protect New York consumers, provide crucial utility reforms and should be included in a final state budget currently being debated in Albany and due to pass by April 1. The recommendations are as follows:
- Funding an Independent Utility Consumer Advocate : An independent consumer advocate is essential to the strengthening of oversight of the state's utilities by giving consumers a seat at the table in complicated rate hike and regulatory hearings and level the playing field. A recent AARP survey found the move is supported by nearly 77% of 50+ consumers in the NYC and Long Island areas. Forty other states in the country already have an independent utility consumer advocate office.
- Establishing Protection for Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) customers : The Moreland Commission recommends re-privatizing LIPA. AARP and PULP believe the costs, benefits, and rate impacts concerning utility consumers on Long Island must be examined when proposing to re-privatize LIPA as well in comparison with continued public ownership.
- Reviewing Utility Performance Regulations : The New York Public Service Commission ("PSC") "Performance Regulation" ratemaking approach should be reviewed and revised or eliminated. It currently allows utilities to set multi-year rates, and then cut costs while keeping savings during the term of the rate plans so long as they satisfy minimum performance standards. These incentives to cut costs may have exacerbated the damage from Superstorm Sandy.
- Protecting Consumers from "pass-through" storm recovery costs : AARP and PULP state that storm-related rate hike proposals, such as the $400 million one being proposed by Con-Edison, must be scrutinized to ensure consumers don't get hit with the costs, while the utility company bears no liability.
- 69% said their elected officials weren't doing enough to protect people affected by rising energy costs.
- 73.2% believed their interests aren't taken into consideration when rate increases for gas and electric are proposed.
- 76.7% said they thought New York needed to establish an independent consumer advocate office to represent them in rate cases before the Public Service Commission.