This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
Feb. 1, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Just days after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that all-metal hip implants can cause soft tissue damage, and a week before trials are scheduled to begin, Johnson & Johnson (J & J) is said to be negotiating a potential
$2 billion settlement with DePuy Hip Replacement System plaintiffs. The FDA urged surgeons to only recommend metal-on-metal hip implants - which can shed metal and damage surrounding bone and soft tissue - after determining that their benefits outweigh those of alternate hip replacement systems. As soon as settlement amounts have been finalized,
RD Legal Funding will make immediate settlement funding available to DePuy plaintiffs and their attorneys.
Between 2007 and 2009, the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry warned DePuy 17 times about ASR problems, including a revision rate twice the normal expectancy rate of 15 years. The first lawsuit in
the United States against DePuy Orthopedics was filed on
June 15, 2010. J & J voluntarily recalled more than 93,000 DePuy ASR hip replacement systems in
August 2010 but maintained that the devices were performing at the same rates as similar devices. In
March 2011, the British Hip Society and British Orthopedic Association reported that revision rates for the ASR at four years were 21%; after six years, 49%. J & J, which now faces some 10,000 suits over the defective DePuy hip replacement system, has offered to pay more than
$200,000 to each plaintiff. So far the plaintiff's attorneys have rejected the offer as too low given their clients' suffering.
Metal-on-metal hip implants were supposed to be more durable than previous ceramic and plastic devices. According to the recent FDA proposal, the metal shed when the device's all-metal ball and socket rub together can damage surrounding bone and soft tissue. The proposal calls on the companies still manufacturing the metal-on-metal devices to provide additional information proving they are safe and effective before being allowed to continue selling them.