This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
AUSTIN, Texas, Jan. 11, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bazaarvoice, Inc. (Nasdaq:BV)issued the following statement in response to the antitrust action filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding Bazaarvoice's acquisition of PowerReviews:
We are disappointed with the filing of yesterday's lawsuit. We provided the DOJ with extensive documents, data, and information demonstrating that our acquisition of PowerReviews was procompetitive and did not result in a lessening of competition. We spent more than six months explaining that there is robust and ample competition in the market for social commerce engagement tools. We disagree with the DOJ's decision to ignore that evidence and we will now shift our attention to a court of law where we expect to be fully vindicated.
There are a number of problems with the DOJ's complaint but perhaps none more so than their overly narrow definition of the product market. There is no single market for "product ratings and review platforms." Ratings and reviews are but one of many tools that brands and retailers can use to engage with their customers as part of an overall social commerce strategy to increase awareness of their products. Other prominent tools include Facebook, Twitter, question and answer, and community forums, and many others. We believe the testimony of Bazaarvoice executives, customers, and competitors will demonstrate this to a judge. But even assuming the validity of the DOJ's product market definition, there is still robust competition for ratings and reviews all over the social commerce landscape – the market is much bigger and more nuanced than the DOJ appreciates.
More generally, we are surprised that the DOJ chose to base this case on a series of dated documents. In doing so, they ignored virtually all of our recent ordinary course documents and substantial economic evidence. The documents excerpted in the complaint, when taken out of context as the DOJ did in its complaint, paint an inaccurate picture of the marketplace. During the litigation, we will focus on rectifying the DOJ's inaccuracies.