NEW YORK (
) -- With
chief executive Richard Handler set to take the reins of
(LUK - Get Report)
, the biggest unanswered question is whether in taking control of a conglomerate often referred to as a "mini"
, Handler can perform up to the standards of investing Superman Warren Buffett.
Or, as in the famed comic's storyline, the deal simply molds a "Bizzaro" Buffett with a company that becomes the antithesis of the investing Man of Steel's performance.
After Monday's deal, Jefferies employees and shareholders are likely still trying to figure out what exactly they are getting in the share combination with Leucadia National and no one is likely to be asking that question more than CEO Handler. He was one of the Jefferies' largest independent shareholders prior to the deal and will be tasked with managing the investment bank and a conglomerate with operations spanning the timber, energy, gaming, real estate and healthcare industries, among others.
Meanwhile, for Wall Streeters, Jefferies sale to Leucadia National highlights a score of questions overhanging the industry.
Does the deal mark the end to the full-service independent investment banking model? That's especially true as rating agency downgrades compel Wall Street firms like Jefferies and
(MS - Get Report)
to strengthen partnerships with commercial banking partners after Merrill Lynch was absorbed by
Bank of America
(BAC - Get Report)
and Bear Stearns was bailed out by
(JPM - Get Report)
. Was the relatively low price of the stock deal an indication of a bearish outlook for the financial sector, as lawmakers wrangle over a so-called
and the European debt crisis remains unresolved?
with Leucadia National certainly raises many big issues for Wall Street, with KBW analysts calling the deal "defensive," and ratings agency Moody's taking a wait and see approach on upgrades, which it could pull the bank from its near speculative grade rating of Baa3.
The more immediate question is whether with Jefferies' operations and management, Leucadia will continue to draw comparison to Warren Buffett's style and Berkshire Hathaway's earnings consistency.
Leucadia National, co-founded in the late 1970's by Ian Cumming and Joseph Steinberg, has grown through acquisitions from a small financial services specialist into a conglomerate with scores of operations and annual revenue in excess of $1.5 billion. The company's structure and long-term perspective of its founders often gives way to comparison to Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, a conglomerate with earnings so diverse it's seen as a proxy for corporate America.
A look at Leucadia National's earnings and even the terms of Monday's deal signal that while the company is diverse and has grown at a Buffett-like clip, it is no Baby-Berkshire Hathaway.
Unlike Berkshire, Leucadia National wasn't able to weather the financial crisis without posting an annual loss. Meanwhile, the company's shares are roughly half what they were prior to the crisis, while Berkshire shares have gained back most of the ground lost since 2008.
In fact, a key piece of Monday's acquisition of Jefferies' remaining shares - Leucadia already owned 28.6% of the company's stock prior - is a multi-billion dollar
net operating loss carry forward
that is capitalized on Leucadia's balance sheet as a result of crisis-time losses.
The New York Times
highlights that Monday's deal is a deviation from Leucadia's course of being a 'Baby Berkshire Hathaway' because Buffett has been reluctant to take direct ownership or even the common stock of
after a failed foray into the business by way of a late 1980s rescue of bond trading pioneer Solomon Brothers.
The more pressing question for investors and Jefferies employees is whether Handler is ready for comparisons to Buffett'?