Search Jim Cramer's "Mad Money" trading recommendations using our exclusive "Mad Money" Stock Screener.
NEW YORK (
) -- Politics is overrated as a way to predict stock performance, Jim Cramer told
viewers Monday on the eve of the presidential election.
What really matters to stock prices, he said, is management and a company's business model, not who happens to occupy the White House.
When it came to technology, both
made the decision five years ago to focus less on hardware and more on software and services. Yet, IBM shares are up 75% since then while Hewlett lost 71% during the same time. Why the difference? Execution and management.
During the Obama administration,
, a stock Cramer owns for his charitable trust,
Action Alerts PLUS
, soared, while
floundered. Why? Apple chose to focus on mobile while Intel didn't.
Many critics cite President Obama as being bad for unemployment, and they'd be right if you looked at shares of
, but not if you considered
. Execution matters, said Cramer.
Whether it's the banks or the drug stocks, two more sectors impacted by Obama, Cramer said investors will find winners, like
, another Action Alerts PLUS name, and losers like
. The same is true in the consumer good sector, with
soaring under Obama, while
Procter & Gamble
Cramer told investors they need to focus less on politics and more on the companies they own.
The Difference Is Carbon
While both presidential candidates want America to become energy self-sufficient, only one thinks we should do so with fossil fuels, Cramer told viewers -- which is why if you think Mitt Romney will pull off an upset Tuesday, there's a whole host of stocks they should consider buying.
The difference between the candidates comes down to carbon. Obama hates it, while Romney feels we need energy independence by any means necessary, which means using more coal and oil along with natural gas as a surface fuel. That's why Cramer said Romney investors should consider stocks like
in the coal patch, along with
in the oil patch.