Santa Cruz Sentinel: "No on warmed over Prop 33."
Sun: "Mercury's billionaire boss
is back…It's a retread of the 2010 ballot proposition, and it deserves rejection too."
: "Proposition 33 would have a significant, damaging consequence… It's a threat to everyone on the road, including conscientious drivers…"
La Opinion (
): "The owner of Mercury Insurance,
, continues to stubbornly try to change the law… This is an abuse of the system of initiatives, which was designed to put the brakes on corporate interests."
Fresno Bee: "Do not let
hijack that process to advance narrow economic agendas. Voters said no to Mercury in 2010, and should say no again on Prop. 33."
Los Angeles Daily News: "One company returns with same self-serving insurance measure voters already rejected in 2010.... Voters should say no to Proposition 33. And this time Mercury Insurance should get the message."
Santa Maria Times
: "Prop 33 is mostly the self-interested brainchild of the billionaire founder of a car insurance company…If the auto insurance industry wants to guarantee that more and more drivers simply choose to drive without insurance protection, thus endangering other citizens, this is one sure way to do it…"
Read these editorials and more at
approaches, Prop 33 is struggling in opinion polls. A broad coalition of senior citizen, consumer, labor, civil rights, environmental and women's organizations, and college student leaders call for the defeat of Prop. 33.
Learn more about who is opposing Prop 33:
SOURCE Consumer Federation of