NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- You've got to be happy in your own skin. That's a big part of what this life comes down to for me. Because, as Bruce Springsteen riffs, It's a sad man, my friend, who's living in his own skin and can't stand the company.
As CEO, Tim Cook has to strike a balance between being himself, being OK with himself and making his mark on Apple (AAPL - Get Report) while preserving the culture that made the company great under Steve Jobs.
Let's break that down vis-a-vis reaction to my contention that Cook's management-related power play makes him look a lot more like Jobs.
A commenter to the above-linked article made a thoughtful observation:
Steve Jobs has been rightly lionized for his ability to create winning products, and demonized for his dictatorial leadership style. By praising Tim Cook for "pulling a power play" you have confused the latter for the former. When Tim Cook releases a revolutionary product he will deserve praise and comparisons to Steve Jobs.That might be the best article comment I have read all year. To a certain extent, the reader nails it. Frankly, I should have reiterated that point in my article because it certainly has been a theme in my writing pretty much since Jobs passed away. The subtitle to the article the reader commented on effectively makes the same point, but with some nuance: While Apple's executive shakeup doesn't seal the deal on future innovation, it shows that Tim Cook has some Jobsian fire. Again, just an extension of my long-term thinking on Apple, but with a twist. You can't paint a complex situation black and white. It's not as simple as Cook will either be like Jobs or he won't. That's the type of sports fan argument that, for better or worse, seeps itself into politics and stock market discussions. Don't make it more complicated than it is. By lopping off the heads of two guys who made bonehead moves, including one who was gunning for his job, Cook showed the world who's boss. He ditched people he considered posers -- dare I say "B" players -- and made it clear who are his top lieutenants. Again, all very Jobsian in the way it went down, although I bet it would have happened sooner under Jobs if it even had to happen at all. There's little doubt in my mind that a non-beta Maps product would have made it to iPhone 5 in the condition it was with Jobs as CEO, even with Scott Forstall behind it. So, as I indicated earlier, Cook deserves part of the blame here. He covered his own butt as much as anything else.