The Above the Law article describes an Apple's (AAPL) "invention discussion session," in which every software tweak engineers mentioned was called a separate patent by lawyers. Judge Richard Posner, who recently tossed Oracle's (ORCL) patent claims against Google (GOOG), has called the current system "chaos."
The obvious answer is for the court to revisit State Street, to strictly limit how much software can be patented, restricting patents to physical inventions that can be produced in the real world.
Such a decision would cost the patent bar (and our biggest high-tech companies) billions of dollars, but justice is also supposed to be blind and look out for the public interest, not any private one.
Too much to hope?At the time of publication, the author has a position in AAPL. Follow @DanaBlankenhorn This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.
Select the service that is right for you!COMPARE ALL SERVICES
- $2.5+ million portfolio
- Large-cap and dividend focus
- Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
- Weekly roundups
Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.
- Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
- Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
- A custom stock screener
- Upgrade/downgrade alerts
- Diversified model portfolio of dividend stocks
- Alerts when market news affect the portfolio
- Bi-weekly updates with exact steps to take - BUY, HOLD, SELL
- Real Money + Doug Kass + 15 more Wall Street Pros
- Intraday commentary & news
- Ultra-actionable trading ideas
- 100+ monthly options trading ideas
- Actionable options commentary & news
- Real-time trading community
- Options TV