NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- China is a fascinating investment destination for reasons related to demographics, urbanization of the rural population, breakneck-speed growth and whether the country could successfully manage that growth.
In the last few years there's been evidence of relatively healthy growth in some parts of the Chinese economy in terms of energy consumption and consumer spending but there are also signs of mismanaged growth in terms of empty cities and empty toll roads.
If there is to be a consequence for this overcapacity it would to the banks that lent the money for these projects. Thus far there has been no apparent consequence focused on the Chinese banks as the Global X China Financials ETF (CHIX) has outperformed the Shanghai Composite Index and performed in line with the Hang Seng Index since the fund's inception.
Investors concerned about whether there could a consequence in the future to the Chinese banks but wanting China exposure would likely seek a fund that avoids that sector. This idea rules out many existing funds including the iShares FTSE China 25 Index Fund (FXI) which currently allocates 52% to financials.The WisdomTree China Dividend ex-Financials Fund (CHXF) gives investors broad-based access to China while at the same time avoiding the sector with most visibility for serious price declines. The new fund targets the 10 largest dividend-paying stocks from each sector except, obviously, the financial sector. Energy is the largest sector in the fund at 24% followed by materials and telecom at 14% each and 13% each for industrials and consumer staples before getting smaller from there. Many of the larger stocks in the fund will be familiar names including China Mobile (CHL) at 8% of the fund, CNOOC (CEO) and PetroChina (PTR) along with several others with less than a 5% weight. From there the companies are likely less recognizable for most investors but should capture the China equity market, again, except for the financials. The WisdomTree Web site reports that the yield for the underlying index is 2.99% which after allowing for the 0.63% expense ratio could put the yield at 2.36% but that remains to be seen. A sub-3% yield is surprising given that China Mobil yields almost 4% along with several others holdings. The apparent yield raises the question of whether a different methodology, such that maybe if the fund only had 50 constituents instead of the actual 62, could have delivered a slightly higher yield.