NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Despite evidence to the contrary (see, e.g., this WSJ report), Amazon.com (AMZN - Get Report) bears keep spreading the fairy tale that the company will lose its competitive advantage as it begins collecting sales tax in more states.
That mindset is almost as misguided as Samsung's. The company kicked off an ad campaign where it puts its Galaxy S III smartphone side-by-side with Apple's (AAPL - Get Report) iPhone. The Galaxy's list of features dwarfs iPhone's. For the sake of argument, forget the fact that Samsung ignored several Apple features.
At his blog, the always-sharp Ken Segall put it best:
The adassumes that comparing technical specs is the best way to choose a phone. If the Galaxy's list is longer, surely it must be superior. This comparison completely bypasses the notion that the user experience plays any role in customer satisfaction.
"The user experience."That's why Apple does not have to release a revolutionary device every time it comes to market with a new iPhone. Everything Apple does -- from design to new or upgraded features -- maintains or enhances a user experience that no other hardware maker comes close to. You can extend this thinking to Amazon's e-commerce platform. When it dawned on my wife and I that we would have to pay sales tax on Amazon.com starting this past weekend, neither of us flinched. And, as sales taxes go, we come in on the high end -- 9.75% I believe. Sales tax collection doesn't level the playing field at all; no other retailer, on or offline, provides a platform as perfect as Amazon's. The best review database and recommendation engine in the business, alongside Amazon Prime, Amazon Instant Video, Subscribe & Save, the Kindle Lending Library . . . no one feature steals the show. It's the combination of these things that ties together the ecosystem. The way Amazon facilitates navigation of that ecosystem creates the overall user experience that hooks you. The user experience makes both Apple and Amazon great. Neither touts the longest or most extravagant list of features. They don't get involved in every area that's hot or even beyond lukewarm. Just compare and contrast the thinking at Apple, more so under Steve Jobs, and Amazon with Jeff Bezos to the pathetic state of affairs at Meg Whitman's Hewlett Packard (HPQ - Get Report). Where Whitman says, "Gee, we really need to be involved in this smartphone thing again," Apple and Amazon say, "OK, if we end up in a space we're there for a reason that serves self-interested purposes, not as a response to a trend somebody else sets."