This Day On The Street
Continue to site
ADVERTISEMENT
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

The Fraud of Negative Gold/Silver Lease Rates: Opinion

VANCOUVER ( Silver Gold Bull) -- Experienced precious metals investors are familiar with the topic of "negative lease rates" for gold and silver bullion. However, even novice investors can infer what is being discussed: paying someone to "borrow" gold/silver bullion.

In general, any time we contemplate a situation where lenders are paying borrowers to borrow, the word "dump" immediately comes to mind. This is because we begin the scenario with a lender choosing to enter into a transaction with the deliberate outcome of losing money.

Because the world of commerce is entirely devoted to earning profits rather than creating losses, this automatically also implies market-manipulation -- and thus fraud.

It is within this general context that we can now look at the particular subject of the gold and silver markets, where lease rates are now usually negative (and are negative again currently ).

With negative lease rates creating a prima facie presumption of manipulation and fraud, the issue then becomes whether the particular fundamentals of the gold and silver markets either support or refute that presumption of fraud.

The easiest way to approach this issue is by asking ourselves a question: Are there conditions where it might make some crude "business sense" to enter into a transaction with the deliberate intent of losing money?

This is ultimately a fairly simple question to answer, When we examine any market we quickly discover that it is very difficult to construct even hypothetical circumstances where it would make sense to lease that asset at negative prices other than illegal/nefarious purposes.

The immediate proposition we must confront is that the moment we separate ownership of an asset from possession of that asset we impair our ability to sell the asset. We are intentionally "encumbering" that asset by lending it to a third party. This is problematic with respect to any and all price behavior in a market.

If prices are rising, we don't want to encumber our asset since it impairs our ability to take profits (through a sale) and incurs further losses at the same time through losing money on the lease transaction.

1 of 4

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using your Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID or Yahoo login credentials. Alternatively, you can post a comment as a "guest" just by entering an email address. Your use of the commenting tool is subject to multiple terms of service/use and privacy policies - see here for more details.
Submit an article to us!
SYM TRADE IT LAST %CHG
AAPL $130.28 0.00%
FB $81.53 0.00%
GOOG $565.06 0.00%
TSLA $218.42 0.00%
YHOO $44.52 0.00%

Markets

DOW 18,080.14 +21.45 0.12%
S&P 500 2,117.69 +4.76 0.23%
NASDAQ 5,092.0850 +36.0220 0.71%

Partners Compare Online Brokers

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs