This Day On The Street
Continue to site
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

Eulogy to the Fed

In the Fed's own words from the announcement, "information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August suggests that economic activity has continued to expand at a moderate pace in recent months." Inflation expectation had been going up above 2%; at close of Thursday it surged to 2.27%. Why now? Why not wait for some clear sign of economic weakness before acting? Why switching the focus to unemployment at this point in time?

It is theoretically possible that Bernanke has at his disposal some amazing forecasting model that sees a pending Lehman-class disaster, say Greece or Germany exiting the euro or Spain defaulting, or severe economic slowdown in the near future. Even then it doesn't make any sense to take pre-emptive action for two simple reasons: 1) you just don't know until it actually happens, and 2) pre-emptive disaster prevention before anyone sees the danger has the problem of having nothing to show for your success, by definition. It's economically risky and politically stupid.

Another fact is that the Fed's balance sheet automatically shrinks if they do nothing, as the bonds they hold accrue interest, mature or get pre-paid. But the rate of this shrinkage is only about $10 billion a month. By adding $85 billion a month, as announced for QE3, the Fed's balance sheet will increase $75 billion a month net, indefinitely. Even the most wild-eyed, far-out QE junkie dared not to expect this.

Some may say "indefinitely" also means he can stop any time. True. But the burden of proof for deviating from $40 billion is now very high, especially on the low side, given Bernanke's explicit promise that he will be late rather than early in stopping the stimulus. It's also odd that they didn't even bother to leave some flexibility in schedule, something along the line of "about $40 billion, subject to the committee's discretion taking into consideration any new economic data." No -- $40 billion, period. This is just absurd.

Political Motive

The only rational explanation left is election politics. This is the only factor with a hard expiration date. And it neatly explains the sudden shift of focus to unemployment rate. Remember how everyone was saying that no president gets re-elected when unemployment runs above 8%?

2 of 3

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using your Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID or Yahoo login credentials. Alternatively, you can post a comment as a "guest" just by entering an email address. Your use of the commenting tool is subject to multiple terms of service/use and privacy policies - see here for more details.
Submit an article to us!
DBA $22.35 0.00%
GLD $113.05 0.00%
SPY $211.65 0.00%
USO $19.67 0.00%
UUP $25.52 0.00%


DOW 18,080.14 +21.45 0.12%
S&P 500 2,117.69 +4.76 0.23%
NASDAQ 5,092.0850 +36.0220 0.71%

Partners Compare Online Brokers

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs