In a hotline message to members, the Association of Professional Flight Attendants calls Judge Sean Lane's ruling "a blistering indictment of the labor unions on American Airlines' property" because the ruling rejected the majority of the arguments made by the Allied Pilots Association.
In his surprising ruling, Lane rejected AMR's bid to reject its existing contract on two points: AMR wants unrestricted ability to furlough pilots and to engage in code-sharing. The APA says this is a victory. AMR says it will rewrite its motion and resubmit it on Friday.
Except for the two points, "the remainder of the court's 100-plus page decision validated each of American's arguments for its business plan and dismantled each of the unions' cases against it," APFA said, in its hotline message. "In short, (Wednesday's) ruling postpones the inevitable abrogation of the pilots' contract."APFA said it does not expect a favorable abrogation ruling if its tentative contract agreement is rejected, in voting that concludes Saturday. "It is more clear today than ever before that the best path for our membership is to accept the last, best, final offer and continue to work towards achieving a merger with US Airways (LCC)." "We can now say with certainty that the (abrogation) process will leave flight attendants worse off than the last, best, final offer," the union said. "There is little doubt that the end result, should we reject, will be 2,000 furloughed flight attendants and many, many more on reserve." For now, AMR pilots are subject to whatever contract the court imposes because last week they rejected a tentative contract agreement by a 61% margin. Former APA president Dave Bates resigned afterwards. The tentative agreement "was bad, (but) it had significant improvements over American's last term sheet," Bates said, in an interview with TheStreet.