This Day On The Street
Continue to site
ADVERTISEMENT
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

Federal Signal Denies Misleading Statements Made By Neology In Patent Litigation

OAK BROOK, Ill., July 31, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Federal Signal Corporation (NYSE: FSS), a leader in environmental, safety and transportation solutions, announced today that Neology, Inc., issued a false and misleading press release on July 30, 2012, regarding litigation between the companies.  Federal Signal issues this release to address Neology's false and misleading statements. 

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120420/CG91760LOGO

The companies are engaged in patent litigation in the United States District Court in Delaware ( Neology, Inc. v. Federal Signal Corp., et al).  Neology filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in the case, asking the Court to enjoin Federal Signal from making or selling certain products.  On June 18, 2012, Magistrate Judge Thynge recommended that Neology's motion be denied. 

Yesterday Neology issued a press release containing a number of false and misleading statements.  Neology falsely stated that "Federal Signal Admitted that [the] Patents are Valid and Infringed" and "FS also admitted that based on Judge Thynge's claim construction that [the] patents are valid and infringed."  These statements are not true.  Federal Signal did not admit that it infringed any of Neology's patents, or that any of Neology's patents are valid.

Neology also falsely states that "Judge Thynge recommended that Neology's patents be found valid and infringed by FS."  In fact, Judge Thynge only made one substantive "recommendation" in her report: "I recommend that the court DENY Neology's Motion for Preliminary Injunction."  Judge Thynge also found that for one Neology patent, Neology had not demonstrated a likelihood of success on infringement.  For three more of its patents-in-suit, Neology did not even ask the Court for a preliminary injunction.  Judge Thynge did make a finding for purposes of the preliminary injunction motion regarding two Neology patents.  However, that finding does not bind the parties as the case proceeds to trial, and Federal Signal has also expressed its disagreement with that finding.  At trial, Federal Signal believes that it will prevail on the infringement and invalidity issues. 

1 of 2

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using your Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID or Yahoo login credentials. Alternatively, you can post a comment as a "guest" just by entering an email address. Your use of the commenting tool is subject to multiple terms of service/use and privacy policies - see here for more details.
Submit an article to us!
SYM TRADE IT LAST %CHG

Markets

DOW 17,826.30 -279.47 -1.54%
S&P 500 2,081.18 -23.81 -1.13%
NASDAQ 4,931.8150 -75.9760 -1.52%

Partners Compare Online Brokers

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs