This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- I really wish I had had time to write about the EU summit last week. The risk-on rally on Friday was spectacular, yet obviously a short squeeze rather than a real bullish turnaround, as evidenced by the significant retraction in all aspects in the week after.
to give up the "super-senior" status of bailout funds; otherwise the bailout recipients would never be able to return to the market for funding, and
to use bailout funds to buy sovereign bonds directly on the open market so as to lower the borrowing costs.
All these steps are important and make sense; had they been taken earlier, we would not have been where we are today. Perhaps the most phenomenal aspect is the fact that even the German Chancellor Angela Merkel
emerged as a winner in domestic politics, as the eurobond remains dead (instead of her), apparently thanks to some hardball negotiation tactics by France, Italy, and Spain.
Unfortunately, reality sunk in quickly again.
As reported by Die Spiegel, the very creation of the European Stability Mechanism, or ESM, will be subject to Germany's constitutional court review on
Tuesday, after the parliament rectified the EU summit agreement Merkel brought back.
FT Alphaville has started laughing at the "loss of super-senior status" bit before the ink was dry. Finland and the Netherlands
have objected to one part of the agreement in a very public way.
as reported by the Wall Street Journal Friday, "a senior European Union official with direct knowledge of the situation" said that "euro-zone countries would still have to guarantee the loans the permanent bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism, gives their banks even if it directly recapitalizes them."
Oops, you mean stretching a circular logic does not change its topology? And even then, the ESM "won't happen in the first half of 2013" anyway. OK, let's go home and get back on that euro short, then.
Cynicism aside, I think this time is a little bit different. At least it makes some sense this time, unlike the very recent
Spanish bank bailout solution, for example. In other words, while there continues to be no reason for hope, at least we also continue to avoid despair. This is about the best thing one can possibly say about the eurozone affair.
Another reason for caution on the bearish front is, according to Bloomberg,
there's still a big euro short position, contrary to the best FX strategists' predictions. Those shorts who could take the pain on June 29 did relatively well. But I don't expect them to continue holding those positions.