Its hardware revenue was no slouch, climbing by almost 10%. So with such an impressive showing, I'm left scratching my head in trying to understand exactly what else can the company do to receive the respect that it deserves.
How is it possible that Salesforce.com can command the P/E that it does while it still reports negative earnings? It makes little sense that both F5 and Juniper are able to command higher P/Es than Oracle.
Without question Wall Street continues to get this story wrong, and even more egregious is the fact that a name like Riverbed continues to command an erroneously high P/E even after reporting
an earnings miss.
It is time that investors wake up to these errors while ignoring a company such as
(MSFT - Get Report), which is a dominant cloud name in its own right and yet remains undervalued.
Its cloud initiative has been ongoing as several of its most popular titles are becoming available on a subscription basis instead of the typical software box as part of its transition towards
its Azure platform
Microsoft is betting on the possibility that customers adopt the openness and flexibility of Azure because it enables users to build, deploy as well as manage applications across global networks. What makes this platform so unique is that it also allows easy integration of public cloud applications to existing enterprises while also enabling networks to build and run highly available applications without focusing on the infrastructure.
From that standpoint, Mr. Softy is the only other cloud name that I consider among the ranks of the underappreciated aside from Oracle.
Furthermore, what should be understood is that while everyone wants to focus solely on the collection of data, the real value will come it analyzing exactly what to do with the information, and how companies can execute decision-making to advance their corporate and enterprise strategies -- an area where Oracle can't be matched.
Also working in its advantage is the company's management team, one where it has a structure in place to address every component of the enterprise. To that end, the company has increased its spending on R&D while simultaneously acquiring companies it thinks can help it remain a leader for years to come.
For example, as a response to recent acquisitions made by rivals
, it has gone on a shopping spree of its own by purchasing most recently Collective Intellect, a firm specializing in social media monitoring.
Given the rate at which companies are accumulating "big data" and positioning their models for cloud efficiency, it seems reasonable to project strong ongoing demand for the services that Oracle provides. Also working in its favor is the fact that it is able to avoid vulnerabilities within the cyclical nature of enterprise spending -- an important factor allowing more consistent growth projections.
The bullish case for Oracle is simple. As businesses continue to strive for growth, the growth process will always place more demand on IT services. And as IT services get more complicated, they will require increased levels of expertise to manage the enterprise. There is no other company more capable of delivering these services than Oracle.