NEW YORK ( Real Money) -- I am inundated daily with calls from clients and associates who tell me that another analyst or pundit is cheering the housing rebound. They follow up by asking me whether or not I have changed my negative opinion of the sector. I have not. However, I will approach the subject again from another tack that I hope provides some clarity.
The most important issues to consider are:
- How many foreclosures have there been?
- How many more will there be?
- What do the banks plan to do with them?
Properties received by banks through the process of foreclosure are carried and accounted for as Other Real Estate Owned (OREO). The three primary categories of OREO are 1-4 Unit Residential, Commercial, and Construction and Development.
In this column, I will only address 1-4 Unit Residential properties, which represent 25% of all OREO at U.S. banks. I will discuss the others in future column or in the comments section below if readers are interested.
There are about 7,000 banks in the U.S. and OREO affects all of them. The principal value of mortgages tied to the OREO at the four largest institutions,
(JPM - Get Report)
Bank of America
(BAC - Get Report)
(C - Get Report)
(WFC - Get Report)
is much lower as a percentage of outstanding loans than at the smaller institutions below them. This is because the smaller banks have foreclosed on non-performing mortgages while the larger institutions have not.
The result of this is that the outstanding value of non-performing mortgages held by the four largest money centers are much higher than at the smaller banks. The money centers have simply not been foreclosing.
The value of the loans attached to OREO, the properties already foreclosed on by the four largest money centers, is only 3% of the value of the non-performing loans they hold; the properties that have yet to be foreclosed on but most probably will be.
The 97% of mortgage loans that have not been foreclosed on but probably will be makes up the largest percentage of what is known as shadow inventory. This number is so horrifically high that even the pundits aware of the issue won't discuss it publicly -- probably because their own livelihoods could be at stake for doing so.