April 12, 2012
/PRNewswire/ -- H Partners Management, LLC ("H Partners"), a beneficial owner of approximately 15.3 percent of Sealy Corporation's (NYSE: ZZ) ("Sealy" or the "Company") outstanding shares, today announced that it intends to withhold votes for all of Sealy's director nominees at the Company's upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for
Wednesday, April 18
"Sealy's Board of Director nominees must be held accountable for overseeing significant value destruction," said
, Partner at H Partners. "We seek change that will benefit all stockholders. H Partners has an excellent track record of collaborating with boards and management teams to achieve strong results, and is eager to work constructively with the Board to restore Sealy to its former greatness."
H Partners noted that leading independent proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS") and Glass Lewis & Co ("Glass Lewis") both recommend that stockholders withhold votes for multiple Sealy Directors. Both advisory firms recommend withholding votes for director nominees
. In addition to these three directors, Glass Lewis recommends that Sealy stockholders withhold votes for
, head of Sealy's Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, was specifically cited by Glass Lewis for allowing a KKR-affiliated director to exert excessive influence. Glass Lewis stated that Sealy's current governance is not sufficiently "pro-shareholder" because "The Company's non-executive chairman is an affiliated director and the Company has neither appointed an independent chairman nor an independent lead or presiding director." Similarly, the ISS report noted: "The chairman of the board is a non-independent non-executive director."(2)
In addition, ISS and Glass Lewis noted potential conflicts of interest at Sealy. ISS cautioned that "33.33% of directors were involved in material RPTs [related-party transactions]." Glass Lewis singled out
, CEO of KKR Capstone, for his conflicts of interest:
"Nominee NELSON serves as CEO of KKR Capstone, which, along with KKR, received approximately
$1.3 million from the Company for portfolio consulting services in the fiscal year 2011. We question the need for the Company to engage in consulting relationships with its directors. We view such relationships as potentially creating conflicts for directors, as they may be forced to weigh their own interests in relation to shareholder interests when making board decisions. In addition, a company's decision regarding where to turn for the best portfolio consulting services may be compromised when doing business with the firm of one of the company's directors."
H Partners made the decision to withhold its votes for incumbent directors only after careful consideration of Sealy's performance, strategy and corporate governance structure. Since Sealy's IPO in 2006, KKR-dominated boards have overseen the destruction of
, or almost 90 percent, of common equity value. H Partners believes that Sealy's Board has:
- overloaded Sealy with debt and taken a short-term approach;
- made numerous strategic errors resulting in an approximate 50 percent decline in earnings;
- repeatedly made questionable CEO selections;
- allowed Dean Nelson, CEO of KKR's in-house consulting firm and a Sealy Director, to exert excessive operational influence with no accountability for his poor performance; and
- paid at least $20.9 million to KKR since Sealy's IPO in 2006(3), which represents a transfer of value from Sealy stockholders to KKR and its affiliates.
Sealy's underperformance has continued in 2012. Sealy's domestic sales grew 0.7 percent in the fiscal first quarter of 2012, significantly below the industry's 26 percent growth during the same period. This implies that Sealy is losing market share at an alarming rate and may have recently lost the number one market position it has held for decades.