This Day On The Street
Continue to site right-arrow
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

Supreme Court Skeptical of 'Obamacare Is a Tax' Argument

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- It appears Obamacare is not a tax.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard the first round of three days of oral arguments Monday about whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is actually a tax, including the case made by Robert Long, an outside lawyer asked by the justices to argue in favor of viewing the legislation as a tax.

"The Anti-Injunction Act imposes a 'pay first, litigate later' rule that is central to Federal tax assessment and collection," Long said in his opening statement. "Congress directed that the section 5000A penalty shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as taxes."

Simply, Long argued that Obamacare qualified as a tax because all Americans would be required to report their health insurance on tax returns to start in 2014, and a penalty would be levied for those who did not report. This fine, Long reasoned, was a type of tax.

The argument came from a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, which held that the penalty was a tax because only a taxpayer who filed on a federal tax return collected by the IRS would be subjected to it.

The Obama administration initially fought the tax point of view, but abandoned it after a Virginia federal court rejected it, according to Forbes.

The justices, however, were not entirely convinced of this logic.

"Now, here, Congress has nowhere used the word 'tax.' What it says is penalty," Justice Stephen Breyer said. "And I know you point to certain sentences that talk about taxes within the Code -- and this is not attached to a tax. It is attached to a health care requirement."

If the Court did find Obamacare to qualify as a tax, hearings of the legislation would likely have to wait until after the "tax" had been put into practice in order to determine if the mandate, or law, had harmed anyone .

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said to Long that the Tax Injunction Act, modeled on the Anti-Injunction Act, would not apply to penalties created to induce compliance with a law, instead of serving the purpose to raise revenues.

"And this is not a revenue-raising measure because, if it's successful, they -- nobody will pay the penalty, and there will be no revenue to raise," said Ginsburg.

1 of 2

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using your Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, OpenID or Yahoo login credentials. Alternatively, you can post a comment as a "guest" just by entering an email address. Your use of the commenting tool is subject to multiple terms of service/use and privacy policies - see here for more details.
Submit an article to us!
YHOO $44.13 -0.69%
AAPL $124.25 -0.14%
FB $81.66 -0.67%
GOOG $542.56 -0.99%
TSLA $187.59 -0.63%


DOW 17,698.18 -77.94 -0.44%
S&P 500 2,059.69 -8.20 -0.40%
NASDAQ 4,880.2280 -20.6570 -0.42%

Partners Compare Online Brokers

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs