Now they know someone will succeed Buffett. But they still don't know who. Buffett did not name him. He only said that the person existed. Problem is, business writers, always overly impressed by every last utterance coming from Buffett, aren't making clear that traders still don't know the identity of this masked man.
Scan headlines--like this one from The New York Post--and you'll get the wrong idea: "Buffett Picks His Heir." Even within the body of stories, other media outlets (yes, TheStreet, I'm talkin' to you) did not specifically note that Buffett did not actually name the successor. Wrote TheStreet: "The letter also revealed that the company's board has identified someone to succeed Buffett as CEO, saying this was `an individual to whom they have had a great deal of exposure and whose managerial and human qualities they admire.'" But it, uh, didn't reveal the dude's name.
The Wall Street Journal (NWS) made the half-told nature of this news clear from the start. This is important to get right. Traders have been pining for clarity. They are yearning for a name. Buffett gave them an assurance, but no clarity or name. Wrote the Journal in a headline that instead of obscuring reality, put it in bold relief: "Berkshire Brings Clarity, if Not Names, to Buffett Succession Plan."This is part of a larger pattern. Back in December, the media reported on Buffett's "successor." Turns out, Buffett said his son Howard Buffett, who is a farmer, will be a steward of Berkshire's values after his father dies. For his contributions, the farmer turned steward won't be paid, but as in the case of the currently anonymous successor, the media did not let details get in the way of a hotly anticipated story.