Bank of America story updated to include Sanford Bernstein downgrade in eighth paragraph.
NEW YORK (
Bank of America
(BAC - Get Report)
's downgrade on Tuesday by Citigroup created a nice opportunity to get into the stock for anyone who is bullish on America.
That's because Bank of America's success or failure depends almost entirely on that of the U.S. economy.
If the economic fortunes of the U.S. climb back, even slightly, Bank of America ought to be a good investment.
At 41% of book value, Bank of America is the cheapest bank stock in the S&P 500, according to
data. That is one third the price of
and less than a quarter of the value of
, which trades at 178% of book.
True, Bank of America was cheaper in December, when it traded at just 28% of book, but it is still ridiculously cheap by historical standards. In December 2010, even after the mortgage-related problems that have caused investors to pummel Bank of America's stock to its current low levels had been in the news for two months, Bank of America traded at 64% of book.
In December 2007, before
blew up but when pretty much every giant bank other than
was preparing to report multi-billion dollar losses, Bank of America traded at 1.29% of book. In December 2002, Bank of America traded at more than double its book value, a valuation that was not at all unusual for the bank in the late 90s and early 2000s.
On a price-to-earnings basis, only
is cheaper than Bank of America when it comes to S&P 500 bank stocks. Bank of America trades at 7.86 times trailing earnings, versus 7.45 for JPMorgan. On a price-to-forward earnings basis, however, Bank of America is again the cheapest at 6.76, according to
Sanford Bernstein analyst sees things differently, however. According to his calculations, Bank of America is one of the most expensive bank stocks on a price-to-2012 earnings basis at 12.5 times earnings. That's one of the reasons he downgraded the shares Wednesday. Still, he acknowledges the shares are cheap at just over 60% of tangible book value.
Why is the bank so cheap? Partly because all banks are cheap. Regulators aren't even close to forgetting about the panicky days of late 2008 and early 2009, and while big banks like Bank of America and Citigroup may have paid back all the bailout money they received from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program at a tidy profit, many jobs and homes were lost in the process, and no one wants to see another bailout.