This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration. Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here
The following commentary comes from an independent investor or market observer as part of TheStreet's guest contributor program, which is separate from the company's news coverage.
NEW YORK (
TheStreet) -- The departure of TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington could have adverse consequences for
AOL's(AOL) business. It also casts an unbecoming light on its leadership, as the media world continues to whine over potential conflicts of interest between AOL's TechCrunch and Arrington's poorly named CrunchFund. Following the announcement of the fund, the ensuing confusion of what Arrington's role with AOL was going to be only added to the drama.
What should have been a simple announcement turned into a mess where AOL management, including CEO Tim Armstrong and Ariana Huffington, appeared confused, with conflicting statements on Arrington's role and the treatment of TechCrunch. So while this should be a non-event, the bigger question is whether this provides a window into how AOL runs. It could also explain why AOL is, losing ground to competitors like
Yahoo!(YHOO) on most metrics.
We have a
price estimate of $14 for AOL stock, which is roughly in line with the current market price.
Arrington's announcement regarding the launch of his own venture fund has clearly been a horribly botched PR job on which journalists have jumped. These folks have pointed out that the fund, which plans to invest in early-stage technology companies, and Arrington's position as co-chief editor of TechCrunch, would create a clear conflict of interest. This seems simple enough.
However, TechCrunch loyalists have defended the decision and Arrington, given his record of disclosure. So we, as many others, give him the benefit of the doubt that, given his background, there will be no abuse or preferential treatment, despite the potential for conflicts of interest. (A conflict of interest that exists in almost all types of business journalism.)
What confuses us is how this could have been so botched up by AOL management and how no one could have seen this coming, given the obvious way it could be perceived by outsiders. On the other hand, letting Arrington go isn't easy.
He has been one of the most prolific and influential voices on technology matters, which has played a big role in building TechCrunch's credibility so far. Whether TechCrunch remains the same post-Arrington is a big question. It depends on who they hire and the level of involvement AOL will now have in dealing with its affairs.