The law firm of
Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
announces that class action lawsuits have been brought on behalf of all persons who purchased the securities of Puda Coal, Inc. (“Puda Coal” or the “Company”) (AMEX:PUDA) between September 15, 2009 and April 11, 2011, inclusive (the “Class Period”), including purchasers of Puda Coal securities pursuant or traceable to the Company’s equity offering (the “Offering”) on or about December 8, 2010.
If you purchased Puda Coal securities during the Class Period and/or pursuant or traceable to the Offering, you may move the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff by no later than June 13, 2011. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Your share of any recovery in the actions will not be affected by your decision of whether to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. You may retain Lieff Cabraser, or other attorneys, as your counsel in the actions.
Puda Coal shareholders who wish to learn more about the actions and how to seek appointment as lead plaintiff may visit Lieff Cabraser’s website at
Sharon M. Lee
of Lieff Cabraser toll free at (800) 541-7358.
Background on Puda Coal Securities Class Litigation
The actions are brought against Puda Coal, certain of Puda Coal’s officers and directors and the Company’s independent auditor for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Puda Coal, headquartered in Taiyuan, Shanxi Province in the People’s Republic of China, is a supplier of premium cleaned coal used to produce coke for steel manufacturing in China. The Company’s operations are conducted exclusively by Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd. (“Shanxi Coal”), an entity controlled by Puda Coal.
The actions allege that during the Class Period, defendants failed to disclose the following material adverse facts which they knew or recklessly disregarded: (1) that the Company’s Chairman, defendant Ming Zhao, had engaged in unauthorized transfers of the ownership/shares of Shanxi Coal to himself; (2) that Zhao had sold 49 percent of Shanxi Coal; (3) that the Company’s ownership stake in Shanxi Coal was substantially less than it had claimed; (4) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.