NEW YORK (
) -- Everyone has an opinion about China as an investment destination. At one end of the debate, China is the straw that stirs the global drink driving demand for resources and everything else on its way to world domination. At the other end of the debate there is a speculative frenzy in real estate and the banks are in serious trouble for being overexposed to empty commercial real estate projects.
Such divergent opinions have yielded a multitude of investment products offering both broad-based and thematic exposure. The newest fund is the
iShares MSCI China Index Fund
and frankly, it is a head-scratcher. The fund intends to offer exposure to both large- and mid-cap stocks. It will have 140 holdings and have an expense ratio of 0.61%. At the sector level it is 37% in financial stocks, 18% in energy, 11% in telecom and 8% in industrial stocks before the sectors get much smaller from there.
The fund, actually, is a head-scratcher on two levels. The first point is that there is almost no mid-cap exposure. The information isn't on the Web site yet, but a call to iShares will tell you that the fund has 65% allocated to what index provider MSCI calls giant companies, 30% to large companies and not quite 5% in mid-cap companies. For now there are no funds targeting only mid-cap stocks in China, but an investor seeking that exposure would probably be better off with the
Guggenheim China All Cap ETF
, which targets 47% in large-cap, 34% in mid-cap and 19% in small-cap. It would be prudent to research Guggenheim's definition of mid-cap and make sure it is compatible with your own.
Equally confounding is the me-too nature of this fund. The me-too concept repeats frequently in the ETF industry, usually for competitive reasons or to offer a full suite of products. The odd thing about this new fund being a me-too product is that the fund provider iShares appears to be copying is ... iShares.
The similar funds in question are the long standing
FTSE China 25 Index Fund
FTSE China HK Listed Index Fund
. MCHI has eight of its top 10 in common with FXI, and nine of its top 10 in common with FCHI. The percentages of the top 10's weightings are very similar as well; MCHI 51%, FXI 60% and FCHI 58%.