NEW YORK (
finally broke its silence on Friday and retail investors trapped in the name since the shares were halted on Wednesday can't be too pleased by what they heard.
In a pair of Form 8-K filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
this morning, RINO disclosed its CEO Zou Dejun had told its accounting firm Frazer Frost LLP that the company hadn't actually entered two contracts that were among those being questioned by a short seller. For this reason, the company's board authorized its audit committee to investigate the matter and cautioned investors that its financial statements dating back to 2008 "should no longer be relied upon."
The strangest revelation came from the text of a letter sent by Frazer Frost to Rino's board that recounts a conversation between CEO Dejun and Susan Woo, a CPA with the firm, wherein Dejun estimates "there might be problems" with between 20-40% of the the company's contracts. (Yes, you read that right, the
is guessing about the validity of a significant portion of his company's contracts!)
That conversation reportedly took place on Nov. 16, the same day Rino issued a
postponing a conference call on its third-quarter results, which were reported the day before (and
should no longer be relied upon
But wait, not to worry, Dejun apparently came back on Nov. 17 and was able to report that, aside from the original two bogus contracts, all was well.
"We further note that in a conversation the following day, November 17, 2010, involving Ms. Woo, several directors of the Company, Company counsel, and Mr. Zou, Mr. Zou stated that he was not sure the day before and went back to look into some things, and found that apart from the two problematic contracts, all other contracts are legitimate and can be verified," states the letter from Frazer Frost disclosed in one of Rino's 8-Ks.
At this point it's difficult to be anything but incredulous about the whole situation. After all, research firm Muddy Waters LLC, the short seller that
raised questions about Rino in a research report earlier this month
has to get the credit for exposing the two "problematic" contracts at minimum, so the idea that the company itself or its accountant are going to set to rights a situation that they didn't even have a handle on in the first place is a stretch.