Institute of Policy Studies survey
found that in 2009, median CEO pay was 263 times the pay of the average worker. In the1970s the ratio was 30 to 1. I guess that's what they call "corporate governance reform." The institute found that the 50 CEOs who laid off the most people over the past two years paid themselves (while weeping, no doubt) an average of $12 million a year.
The 2009 crop of overpaid corporate lichen cited in the report includes Fred Hassan, ex-CEO of
, who threw 16,000 people out of work after it merged with
(MRK - Get Report)
last year. He received a golden parachute of more than $49.6 million, making him the richest job-slasher of the bunch. Right up there is Ivan Seidenberg, CEO of
who raked in $17.5 million at the same time that his telecom was laying off thousands. Coming close behind Ivan 's treasure chest is Dan Hesse, CEO of
, who poured $12.3 million into his bank account at the same time that he mailed over 10,000 pink slips.
Now, keep in mind when the boss-to-prole ratio numbers come out that CEOs are always paid fairly, even when their paychecks seem insane. A Sprint-Nextel spokesperson pointed out to the Kansas City Star that "every Sprint employee's compensation, including the majority of Dan Hesse's, is tied to company performance." I suspect that this fair-pay system is already in place for one of my favorite CEOs,
(OSTK - Get Report)
Facebook-pretexting Patrick Byrne
. He doesn't draw a salary --and judging from the recent earnings disappointment and stock-price slaughter, he is still paid too much. In the plutonomy, you see, no matter what the salary, competence is always optional. What we really need is a brains-to-bucks ratio.